Anima and animus
Concept · Psychology
Jungian archetypes: the anima is the unconscious feminine component of men, and the animus the unconscious masculine component of women.
The anima and animus are two complementary archetypes in the analytical psychology of Carl Gustav Jung. The anima stands for the totality of unconscious feminine psychological qualities a man possesses, and the animus for the masculine ones a woman possesses. Both belong to the collective unconscious and appear mainly in dreams and fantasies, and in the way each person relates to the opposite sex.
The terms come from Latin: "anima" means "soul" and "animus" means "spirit". Jung began using "anima" in the early 1920s for the inner feminine side of men, and "animus" was adopted shortly afterwards for the masculine side of women. Jung regarded them as anthropomorphic archetypes, unlike the more animal-like archetypes of the shadow, and he did not think they were simply an aggregate of parents, siblings or teachers, although personal experiences shape their concrete form.
Jung described four stages of anima development, which he named after traditional figures: Eve, as object of desire and provider of nourishment; Helen, as a woman capable of worldly achievement; Mary, as an embodiment of virtue; and Sophia, as a fully human and individual woman. For the animus he proposed four levels as well: mere physical strength, action or romance, the power of the word and opinion, and finally spiritual meaning, represented by Hermes, the guide and messenger. Jung considered the anima, given its strong emotional charge, one of the most important autonomous complexes in men.
In Jungian psychology, integrating these archetypes is seen as a path toward psychological balance: a man who recognises his anima opens himself to sensitivity, intuition and creativity, and a woman who integrates her animus develops reason and judgement. The concepts have nonetheless been criticised for relying on gender stereotypes and for being hard to test empirically, so it remains debated whether they describe universal psychological realities or cultural constructions of their time.
Authors who use it
- Emma Jung 1882–1955
- Toni Wolff 1888–1953