
Dmytro Dontsov
1883–1973 · Ukrainian nationalist thinker, publisher and journalist
Dmytro Dontsov (Melitopol, 1883 – Montreal, 1973) was a Ukrainian writer, publisher and political thinker, regarded as the founder of the theory of integral nationalism. His radical ideas shaped the more uncompromising wing of the Ukrainian nationalist movement and had a strong influence on the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists. He matters because he gave a doctrinal form to a nationalism that rejected the socialism of his youth and called for Ukraine to separate from Russia.
Born into a family of former Cossack officers, he was orphaned young and raised largely by his grandfather. After studying law in Saint Petersburg he drifted toward socialism, joined the Ukrainian Social-Democratic Labor Party in 1905 and was arrested more than once. Around 1913 he broke with the party and publicly argued for Ukrainian independence from Russia. During the First World War he ran propaganda offices in Berlin, Vienna and Bern, and in 1918 he worked with Hetman Pavlo Skoropadskyi's government. In the interwar years he settled in Lviv and published journals and essays calling for a deep nationalism, a united national will and the use of violence to overthrow the old order.
After the Second World War he settled in Canada and taught Ukrainian literature. His thought drew closer to fascism in the 1930s and was rejected by much of the postwar Ukrainian intelligentsia, although it remains highly regarded on the Ukrainian far right.
Key ideas
- Integral nationalism: the nation should be understood as a united collective will, above class divisions and ties to other peoples.
- Separation from Russia: Ukraine should turn toward the West and break all ties with Russia.
- Initiative minority: a determined, organised minority, modelled on Italian fascism and Bolshevism, should lead the nation.
- Violence as a tool: violent action is necessary to overthrow the old power and build a new national order.
Curiosities
An essay on force
In 1911 he wrote that in politics it is the argument of force, not the force of argument, that matters, a line that sums up his view of conflict.
Original Filopedia text based on Wikipedia (es) and Wikipedia (en) and Wikidata.